<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ameel&#039;s Career &#38; MBA Exposition &#187; journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insanityworks.org/acme/tag/journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insanityworks.org/acme</link>
	<description>Ameel&#039;s Melbourne Business School MBA journey and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Huffington on Journalism, Response to Murdoch</title>
		<link>http://insanityworks.org/acme/2009/12/03/huffington-on-journalism-response-to-murdoch/</link>
		<comments>http://insanityworks.org/acme/2009/12/03/huffington-on-journalism-response-to-murdoch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ameel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arianna huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pete cashmore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rupert murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insanityworks.org/acme/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#8217;t keep up with large traditional media&#8217;s continued efforts to remain both large and traditional you might have missed Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s latest thoughts on the topic. Here&#8217;s what Mashable&#8217;s Pete Cashmore had to say about them: Microsoft and News Corp in Discussions to Remove Newspaper Content from Google Yes, really. Rupert Murdoch’s crusade [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t keep up with large traditional media&#8217;s continued efforts to remain both large and traditional you might have missed Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s latest thoughts on the topic. Here&#8217;s what <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/22/microsoft-and-news-corp-in-discussions-to-remove-newspaper-content-from-google/" target="_blank">Mashable&#8217;s Pete Cashmore had to say about them</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Microsoft and News Corp in Discussions to Remove Newspaper Content from Google</strong></p>
<p>Yes, really. Rupert Murdoch’s crusade to blame Google for the failing newspaper business model continues today, as it emerges that News Corp has conducted talks with Microsoft about de-indexing the company’s sites from Google and (presumably) being paid to include them in Bing instead.</p>
<p>The concept makes sense only if you buy Murdoch’s claims that Google is &#8220;stealing&#8221; content rather than simply helping people find it.</p></blockquote>
<p>A number of people have responded to Murdoch&#8217;s proposed (threatened?) business model but <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/journalism-2009-desperate_b_374642.html" target="_blank">Arianna Huffington really hit the nail on the head in a talk she gave at a recent journalism conference in the US</a>.</p>
<p>In responding to Murdoch and traditional media, she said:</p>
<blockquote><p>In most industries, if your customers were leaving in droves, you would try to figure out what to do to get them back. Not in the media. They&#8217;d rather accuse aggregators of stealing their content.</p>
<p>[..]</p>
<p>Thinking that removing your content from Google will somehow keep it &#8220;exclusive&#8221; shows a fundamental lack of understanding of the web and how it works.</p>
<p>[..]</p>
<p>In his speech this morning, Rupert Murdoch confused aggregation with wholesale misappropriation. Wholesale misappropriation is against the law &#8212; and he has legal redress against that already. Aggregation, on the other hand, within the fair use exceptions to copyright law is part of the web&#8217;s DNA. Period.</p></blockquote>
<p>She then went on to talk about what the future of journalism will (and is starting to) look like:</p>
<blockquote><p>We hear lots and lots of talk these days about saving newspapers &#8212; Congressional anti-trust exemptions, perhaps? &#8212; but we mustn&#8217;t forget: the state of newspapers is not the same thing as the state of journalism. As much as I love newspapers &#8212; and fully expect them to survive &#8212; the future of journalism is not dependent on the future of newspapers.</p>
<p>Indeed, the future of journalism is to be found, at least partly, in the rapidly growing number of people who connect with the news in a whole new way.</p>
<p>News is no longer something we passively take in. We now engage with news, react to news and share news. It&#8217;s become something around which we gather, connect and converse. We all are part of the evolution of a story now &#8212; expanding it with comments and links to relevant information, adding facts and differing points of view.</p>
<p>In short, the news has become social. And it will become even more community-powered: stories will be collaboratively produced by editors and the community. And conversations, opinion, and reader reactions will be seamlessly integrated into the news experience.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s an excellent speech that&#8217;s well worth the read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insanityworks.org/acme/2009/12/03/huffington-on-journalism-response-to-murdoch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

