Society’s Cognitive Surplus (and what we do with it)
Filed Under life, media, social media
What happens to all the cognitive surplus that exists in society today? A lot of people spend it on watching television…but a lot of others don’t.
Read the transcript of an awesome speech on Gin, Television, and Social Surplus that Clay Shirky gave at the Web 2.0 conference a few days ago.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Updated Who Owns What
Filed Under media, social media, technology
In the wake of Microsoft’s bid for Yahoo!, Amy Webb from mydigimedia has updated the Who Owns What list to version 2.1 (available for download as a PDF). It includes the important recent acquisitions by Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, AOL, News Corporation, and IAC and makes an interesting read. [Via Download Squad].
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Amazon Acquires Audible
Filed Under media, social media, technology
Well, whaddya know? Amazon has reached a deal to acquire Audible. Amazon now sells books, e-books, and audio books. Awesome. [CNET, Last100]
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Apple & Netflix: Different Markets for Online Rentals
Filed Under media, technology
Saul Hansell wrote a good, “hold your horses, there”-type article in the New York Times on the apparent all-out war between Netflix and Apple’s online movie rental offerings. In the article he explains that, while both are technically in the online movie rental business, they actually cater to different markets: Netflix concentrates on having a large collection of older movies as an add-on to its DVD rental business while Apple is going after the latest releases and is positioning itself as an alternative to DVD rentals. And, though there is an overlap, for the time being both companies should be happy in their own niches.
Of course, there’s also the issue that Netflix’s service doesn’t work on the Mac while iTune’s service works on any OS as well as on Apple’s portable media devices (Apple TV, iPod, etc.). Again, that’s not too much of an issue since they are catering to different markets. People who rent DVDs are probably not the type who’d want to watch a movie on their tiny iPod screens. Of course, Netflix is still missing out on the small proportion of users who own only a Mac, but I guess adding a Mac-compatible offering of an already add-on service isn’t all that high in its list of priorities.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Apple & Netflix: Online Movie Rentals
Filed Under media, technology
So a couple of fun things have happened in the online media landscape over the last few days.
First, in anticipation of the announcement that everyone was expecting from Steve Jobs during his Macworld keynote address, Netflix ditched its online movie viewing quota. Steve O’Hear from Last100 explains what that means:
As of today, all subscribers except those on the most basic two DVDs per-month plan will be given unlimited access to the 6,000+ movies available as part of Netflix’s Internet streaming option, dubbed “Watch Instantly”. Previously, subscribers were offered a limited number of Internet viewing hours based on which DVD rental plan they were on.
This is really cool, especially since Netflix has a subscription model and doesn’t charge on a per-movie basis.
Second, as expected, Steve Jobs announced Apple’s entry into the online movie downloads space during his keynote address yesterday. To see how this stacks up against Netflix’s model, O’Hear compared the two based on (1) content, (2) pricing, and (3) convenience.
Each offering has its pros and cons: Neither has the upper hand in content, Netflix has better pricing (subscription model), while Apple has greater convenience (great hardware-software coupling and the ability to watch the downloaded movie on multiple devices). Of course, both are still limited by telecommunications infrastructure (especially Apple’s movies-in-HD offering for Apple TV) and the reluctance of movie studios to fully embrace the online rental concept. And though the market for online movie rentals is still small, it is growing (thanks, in part, to the writer’s strike).
So, at this time, it’s not clear how things will go. What I do know is that 2008 should be a fun year in online movie rentals.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | 2 Comments
Wikipedia
Filed Under media, technology
Earlier today Tim O’Reilly wrote an excellent article on how Wikipedia is the new face of publishing. Fundamentally, he writes, Wikipedia is much like any other publishing organization because it has both “a large network of contributors and a core of committed regulars”. That is why it puzzles him when publishing houses scoff at Wikipedia’s content generation model. After all, they use the same model themselves.
This is just as true of any publishing company. Did Bloomsbury’s editors invent Harry Potter? No, it was a welfare mom who dreamed up the idea while riding on the train.
What has changed, though, is the technology that brings contributors and publishers together and the speed at which all this happens.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Why the US News Media is, well, Crap
Filed Under media, social media
John Hockenberry, a former NBC Dateline correspondent, writes a fascinating article in the January/February 2008 issue of MIT’s Technology Review in which he talks about how the US news media actively chooses to go with emotion-centred news stories (that appeal to as many people as possible) as opposed to more relevant, hard-hitting, and (dare I say) real news stories.
Networks are built on the assumption that audience size is what matters most. Content is secondary; it exists to attract passive viewers who will sit still for advertisements. For a while, that assumption served the industry well. But the TV news business has been blind to the revolution that made the viewer blink: the digital organization of communities that are anything but passive. Traditional market-driven media always attempt to treat devices, audiences, and content as bulk commodities, while users instead view all three as ways of creating and maintaining smaller-scale communities. As users acquire the means of producing and distributing content, the authority and profit potential of large traditional networks are directly challenged.
It’s a long article, though, so if you want a quicker version, read what Jacqui Cheng has to say about it over at Ars Technica. Both are great to read, by the way.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Hollywood Directors that Generate the Most Money
Filed Under media
Peter Sciretta from /Film has compiled a list of the ten highest revenue generating Hollywood film directors. Obviously, Steven Spielberg tops the list and, if you want a list of the next ten, check the comments.
Interestingly, as Sciretta points out, six of the top ten have been involved in trilogies, three others have been involved in big franchises, and the only one who hasn’t done either is in the process of directing his first sequel. Oh, and they’re all white men, of course.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Mediabay: Australian Media Directory
Filed Under media, social media
Ever wanted a basic (i.e. address, phone number, and URL) media company directory for Australia that is both online and free? Mediabay.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment
Digital Music in 2007
Filed Under media, social media
Hot on the heels of his Internet TV in 2007 roundup, Last100’s Steve O’Hear has written a good roundup of digital music in 2007. He talks about DRM, mobile music stores & services, and the other alternative models for online music distribution that were used in 2007.
Post Linx
Permalink | Trackback |
|
Print This Page | Leave a Comment